Reading reflection Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 2

Reading reflection - Essay ExampleBarrs approach is clear and considerate in relation to the vital requirements of an shammer. Chapter 14 of his book, Acting for the Camera, talks around how a person can successfully remember his/her lines in acting by thinking about(predicate) both their roles and their partners. It is much easier to think about the scene than remember the lines. Also, when a person considers the roles played by their partners, as well as their partners lines, it will be easier for the individual to remember his/her part in the actor than trying to memorize his/her lines. This might lead to confusion as it has been noted in the past where actors delineate lack of full aw arness of their roles in acting. According to Barr (83), learning the lines of a scene is a primary process. The author advises actors that they should not, in reality, try to learn the lines since they be not imperative, but they should try and learn the logical implication of the scenes tak ing place.According to Barr (84), if an actor only memorizes his/her lines, then they will just be responsive to a cue rather than a stimulus. The harsh truth is that, if the actor only endeavors to learn his lines, then he/she will speak when they appropriate cue words are thrown at him/her, and hence, lack connection, as well as depth. Connection and depth are the main factors, which draw viewers to a scene. They are able to relate to the scene if the actors show a connection and understanding to the scene (Barr 85). It is extremely a poor for an actor to appear as if they are being forced to act. Lack of understanding of the scenes, as well as the lines, will also portray lack of interest in the entire act. Therefore, when the actors are not connected to the scenes, the audience also will not relate to the acting.Barr stresses on this matter in the entire chapter 14 of his book whereby understanding the scene would lead to understanding the lines. If, hence, the actor relates pro perly to the stimulus, which causes a verbal