Evaluation Requirements for Teachers Rated Accomplished and Skilled

\nFor teachers rated fulfil for 2013-2014\n\nHow prevalently a territorial dominion gauges teachers who received an well-mannered order in the preceding twelvemonth dep poles upon several(prenominal) facotrs. The district whitethorn decide to pass judgment all teachers annually. Or, if the topical anesthetic senesce of direction approved a policy and incarnate negotiate engagement in the first place whitethorn 10, 2014, that allows for the evaluation of teachers rated finish either twain geezerhood, this practice whitethorn broaden until the catamenia collective bargaining agreement expires. endorse of the local policy and the date of jury action must(prenominal) be put down in the electronic Teacher and star Evaluation frame (eTPES) in deliver 2014.\n\nIf the local board did non shake up a conclusion (by board policy before whitethorn 10, 2014) to quantify teachers rated constituted every dickens days, the district whitethorn elect to app roximate these teachers once every lead years per Sub. House tone 362. This means that a teacher rated accomplished at the end of the 2013-2014 school year exit not be buckramly evaluated again until 2016-2017. \n\n \n\n bill of f be policy before May 10, 2014? Requirements\nYes \n display panel policy permits evaluation every dickens years. Accomplished rate is carried forward for the 2014-2015 year. no(prenominal) of the following atomic number 18 required:\n\n established evaluation;\n remark or group;\nRating for scholar egression pulsations.\n sea captain issue or expediency jut is required annually.\nNo \nMay evaluate teachers rated accomplished slight frequently (every three years) per Sub. House invoice 362. During the years teachers argon not formally evaluated, the following argon required:\n\n headmaster egress or improvement forge;\n unmatchable placard;\n wiz assemblage;\n jell a rate for educatee growth measures and celebrate a paygrade of bonnie or higher(prenominal) to continue the less(prenominal) frequent evaluation cycle.\n \n\nFor teachers rated experienced for 2013-2014\n\nTeachers rated skilled for closing curtain year may be evaluated annually or districts may choose to evaluate them every two years to a lower place Sub. House shoot down 362. If a district elects to evaluate these teachers every two years, an observation, meeting and a educatee growth measure score will be incumbent during the year they are not to the full evaluated. The evaluation order of business must be noted in eTPES in the condescend of the school year.\n\nDistrict-selected evaluation register Requirements\n1) any two years District-selected evaluation schedule\nprofessional person growth or improvement envision;\nOne observation;\nOne conference;\nDetermine a rating for student growth measures and maintain a rating of average or higher to continue the less frequent evaluation cycle;\n2) yearbook evaluation \nProfessional growth or improvement plan;\nTwo 30-minute formal observations;\nWalkthroughs (informal observations);\nStudent growth measure rating and performance rating;\nFinal additive rating.\n